Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Re: Multi-site. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Re: Multi-site. Afficher tous les articles

Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

lundi 29 décembre 2014

I would note with a touch of irony that it is this mentality that actually *encourages* us to be isolationist rather than the result of something else. Bashing us over the head for our weaknesses doesn't encourage them to fix them, it makes us defensiv...



Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

dimanche 28 décembre 2014


Quote


Or at least, don't criticize other systems for issues with plugins, that are not included by default and are not required for the usage.






Where do we stand on the necessity of caching plugins for WordPress then? Because for any site with ...



Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

RolandK I think you are making things up as I don't recall and cannot find TonyG statement on this:




As Tony-G rightly observed, if a mod developer abandons a project, there w...








Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

jeudi 25 décembre 2014


Indeed, the W word is something of a profanity around here ;D Mostly because the veteran keyboard warriors here have had to fix sites mangled by things WordPress does on som...








Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

which is nto to say that Wordpress does not have its uses. I actually do run 3 blog sites that user wordpress -- because they ARE pure blogs. My thoughts - others comments on those.



Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology

Indeed, the W word is something of a profanity around here ;D Mostly because the veteran keyboard warriors here have had to fix sites mangled by things WordPress does on some level.



Re: Multi-site, single-signon topology
 

Lorem

Ipsum

Dolor