Re: The future of SMF

* Herman's Mixen Agreed Arantor One

Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

* live627 applauds

Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

Quote from: Antechinus on Today at 04:02:25 AM

Beats me why it still has the text that says "Pages:". It's obviously a page index. Everyone knows how they work these days. That text is a waste of space.

Gotta...



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

Yes you can do that, but having lots of tiny stuff all over the place is traditional.



Beats me why it still has the text that says "Pages:". It's obviously a page index. Everyone knows how they work these days. That text is a waste of space.



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

Can make at least the Increase font?



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

It's not my place to say whether a lot of people use it or not. Fact is, it's a barrier to doing something with this as it currently stands.



Good luck convincing people this needs changing, though...



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

Quote from: Arantor on Today at 09:07:15 PM

No disagreement from me, but I also know that the way SMF expands when you press the ... button makes this very much non-ideal to work with.

Not sure that a lot of ...



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

No disagreement from me, but I also know that the way SMF expands when you press the ... button makes this very much non-ideal to work with.



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

Quote from: Arantor on Today at 09:03:25 PM

It's purely a styling thing, rather than anything else.

Ok. But it's more usable styling thing then SMF default theme have.



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

You realise those 'regular buttons' are *also* just links, right? It's purely a styling thing, rather than anything else.



Re: The future of SMF

Re: The future of SMF

Please be aware that there is minimal/no support for any non-release version of SMF. If you run into an issue, you'll have to solve it yourself.



Re: The future of SMF